With extreme heat expected and water supplies dwindling, experts at a monthly county drought briefing praised conservation while warning drought is now looking like it will linger into the coming winter. 

  

Summing things up, Supervisor Chris Coursey said, the weather hasn't been kind.  

 

"Well, the first seven months of the year, have been the driest in Sonoma County in the past 128 years, with rainfall twenty inches below what's normal. I am an optimist by nature, but our main storage reservoir, Lake Sonoma is now more empty than it is full." 

 

With the first real rains likely more than two months away, that will only get worse.

  

Brooke Bingaman, a lead forecaster at the National Weather Service's Bay Area office, said computer models point to La Nina persisting. That may or may not mean another dry winter, as La Nina's impacts locally can vary.

  

The prediction prompted the usual calls for conservation: drip irrigation, full laundry loads, and other efforts. Again, Chris Coursey.

  

"If you're not doing it already, get a bucket, use that bucket as you warm up water in your sink or in your shower. Collect that water, use it in your garden and then you've got really appreciative plants, and you can feel good about doing your part to help us all get through this drought."

  

Conservation is helping the region weather the dry weather. Replying to concerns that new housing will make water more scarce, Marcus Trotta, principal hydrologist with Sonoma Water, says that's not really the case.

  

"Even as the overall population has increased to our customers from about 500,000 to 600,000 people the overall usage has gone down"

  

Coursey added Santa Rosa uses 14 percent less water than decades ago, even as the population rose 57 percent. In the 1990s, the average person used 160 gallons a day. That's been trimmed to 100, he said.

 

 

Well-loved and long-travelled, the nearly ninety-year-old Pratt Pony truss bridge spanning the Russian River at Monte Rio is nearing a date with oblivion.

 

More of an utilitarian work horse from the 1930's Works Progress Administration-era than a marvel of engineering sporting soaring elements, the bridge, despite a landmark designation, has reached the end of the line.

  

Janice Thompson is deputy director of engineering and maintenance with Sonoma County Transportation and Public Works.

  

"She was built in 1934 and she has served us well"

  

Time however, marches on. While it lacks modern features such as wider lanes for bigger vehicles or a breakdown lane, findings ruling it seismically deficient---and too expensive to retrofit, means replacement.

  

Environmental reports were recently approved by the county board of supervisors, capping an eight-year process deemed fast-tracked.

  

"The new design is called a steel-tied arch. First of all, it's wider. There'll be twelve foot travel lanes, eight foot shoulders, a barrier between that and a six foot sidewalk on both sides. It's going to be a very nice-looking bridge," Thompson said.

  

There will even be mid-span areas to enjoy the view.

  

The design and route---the new bridge will be just downstream from the existing one---were selected in a series of community meetings, which proceeded with little opposition, Thompson said. 

 

It will be 54-feet wide, practically double what it will replace. Despite federal and state funding, the county is at the helm.

  

"It's one of our largest construction projects that we've ever taken on."

  

The county is now negotiating with about a half dozen property owners to purchase the right of way. It won't go up overnight though.

  

"We have work windows for environmental reasons," Thompson said. 

 

Those reasons being migrating salmon and steelhead. In-stream work can only occur between May and October.

  

"When you schedule it out, it's a three year project."

  

The current bridge, unlike it's upstream cousin in Guerneville, will be demolished.

With some states adding restrictions or prohibiting abortion, California is moving in a different direction. Nevertheless, local medical experts say they remain concerned about access, misconceptions and the future, even in solid blue California.  

 

A statewide constitutional amendment guaranteeing a right to abortion and contraception is set to go before voters in November.

  

But at a roundtable meeting convened on a recent Friday by North Bay congressman Mike Thompson Friday, it was obvious concerns remain.

  

Cheryl Johnson, executive director of the Sonoma Valley Community Health Center, says patients seeking care are whipsawed by sudden shifts.

  

"This toppling of Roe V Wade is just a real cornerstone for other rights to be taken away. And, so what we are seeing right now is people who are coming in are anxious because of the fact that they don't know what is the next right that is going to be toppled."

 

Johnson was joined by officials from clinics in Santa Rosa and Petaluma. They say prohibitions will mean fewer medical students being trained, causing a long term brain drain that will stymie access.

 

Johnson said a class divide is developing.

  

"People who have money, who have means they will find a way to get their contraception, their abortions, but people who do not have those opportunities will be the ones who have to take advantage of social programs, of other types of governmental support."

  

And such programs are seemingly on the perpetual chopping block. Others told Thompson the 'public charge rule' results in many who qualify, avoiding medical help, concerned that receiving taxpayer help will upset their immigration status.

  

Nevertheless, attendees, including Margaret Martinez Franks, feel there is strong support here.

  

"Thankfully, the governor has been incredible in allowing a huge amount of state funds to go toward abortion care and reproductive health care. That money is going to go a long way to assuring that not only Californians, but those coming in from out of state are able to get the health care that they need and that they deserve.

 

The attorney representing the family of a man killed by a Sonoma County sheriff's deputy in July says that the officer who shot him did not follow proper protocol and does not have the proper temperament to be in law enforcement.

Izaak Schwaiger, who has represented many parties in suits against law enforcement, is launching a federal wrongful death lawsuit against both the county and the deputy for the death of David Pelaez Chavez, 36, of Lower Lake.

Pelaez Chavez was shot by Deputy Michael Dietrick on July 29 in rough, hilly terrain near Geyserville after officers said they repeatedly asked him to drop a hammer and a tiller he held in one hand and a rock in the other.

Pelaez Chavez does not speak English and the deputies used rudimentary Spanish to communicate with him, using words like "alta" (stop), "no mas, no mas" (no more) and "amigo" (friend). They never asked him to drop his items in Spanish, according to footage released by the Sheriff's Office.

An investigation into the shooting has been undertaken using the Sonoma County Critical Incident Protocol and the Sonoma County District Attorney's Office is also leading an independent investigation. Schwaiger questions whether the shooting may also fall under Assembly Bill 1506, passed in 2020, which dictates that any law enforcement officer-involved shootings against a suspect who is not wielding an object that is a "deadly weapon" will be investigated by the state attorney general.

"Deadly weapons" in the law are outlined as "any loaded weapon from which a shot, readily capable of producing death or other serious physical injury, may be discharged, or a switchblade knife, pilum ballistic knife, metal knuckle knife, dagger, billy, blackjack, plastic knuckles, or metal knuckles," though are not limited to only those things.

Sheriff's Sgt. Juan Valencia said the Sheriff's Office can't comment on the shooting since it is under independent investigation, but that Bonta's office said that a rock is indeed a deadly weapon.

A spokesperson for Bonta's office said that they are aware of the Pelaez Chavez case, but that their office is "currently not involved" in the case. They also further defined what constitutes a deadly weapon:

"Objects that have a legitimate non-weapon purposes are considered deadly weapons only when, based on all the circumstances, they are actually being used in a manner likely to produce death or great bodily injury. The following are examples of objects that have been considered a deadly weapon when used in that manner: knives, box cutters, screwdrivers, bottles, chains, automobiles, rocks, razor blades, and iron bars."

Schwaiger, the attorney representing the Pelaez Chavez family, said parsing the text of AB 1506 might come into play in this case, as to whether a rock in one hand and a hammer and a gardening tool in the other constitutes deadly weaponry. Schwaiger said that Bonta should investigate the shooting but probably won't.

Schwaiger questions not only if the deputy needed to take Pelaez Chavez's life, but if more could have been done to take him into custody alive.

The shooting was a culmination of several events that led to a barefoot Pelaez Chavez wandering deep in the hills of Geyserville as deputies closed in and a helicopter circled overhead.

The sheriff's communication center first received a phone call at 7:30 a.m. about a suspicious vehicle in Geyserville. At 8:20 a.m., the call center again received a report of a suspicious situation at a residence in Healdsburg. The resident said that someone had just tried to use a rock to break a window at his home.

A follow-up interview revealed that the homeowner said Pelaez Chavez walked onto his property carrying large rocks. He was not wearing any shoes. The resident said he armed himself for his own safety. Pelaez Chavez allegedly walked over to the exterior door of a bedroom and used a rock to smash the windowpane of the door, deputies said.

The armed homeowner told Pelaez Chavez to leave, firing off two warning shots to get the point across. Pelaez Chavez then encountered an employee of the homeowner, forced him away from his truck and started to drive it away, dragging the truck's owner 20 feet. The truck's owner did not suffer significant injuries. Pelaez Chavez then drove through several vineyard gates and property fences. Ultimately, he crashed the truck into a ditch near the 5600 block of Tre Monte Lane.

From there he went on foot to another residence in the same area, the Sheriff's Office said. He was carrying several more large rocks and went to the back of the residence. This homeowner also armed himself and told Pelaez Chavez to leave his property. Pelaez Chavez allegedly told the homeowner to shoot him.

Pelaez Chavez then fled southeast, where he found a Gator-style utility vehicle near a ranch storage area. He stole the vehicle and drove east on Thomas Road and then south on rural roads. Pelaez Chavez drove through two more ranch gates and then crashed the utility vehicle on a rural road. After that he fled on foot over dense hillsides, heavy brush, up steep terrain and through creeks with no shoes, deputies said. Before deputies could stop him, he had traveled about a mile in 45 minutes, they said.

Once deputies met up with Pelaez Chavez, they allege that he repeatedly made "nonsensical" statements and refused to drop the hammer, tiller and rock. On the body-worn camera footage, Pelaez Chavez can be seen and heard yelling. Deputies can also be heard discussing his mental health, mentioning whether he should be "5150'd," which means being detained in a psychiatric setting.

Dietrick then engaged with Pelaez Chavez, and allegedly told him to drop his weapons again. The Sheriff's Office said that Pelaez Chavez refused and continued to yell nonsensical statements. He dropped one river rock, bent over to get another and allegedly indicated that he was threatening to throw it at the deputy. On the body-worn camera footage, Pelaez Chavez drops his hand with a rock in it down to the ground and hunches down at the knees.

Dietrick then fired three rounds, striking Pelaez Chavez at 10:03 a.m. The Sheriff's Office alleges that the suspect had picked up another "cantaloupe-sized" rock and was poised to throw it, prompting the shots.

The deputies involved in the event are Dietrick and Deputy Anthony Powers. Both men are on administrative leave, the Sheriff's Office said.

Schwaiger says that people should watch the body-worn camera footage to see the stark difference between how Powers handled the situation versus Dietrick, the shooter.

"The approach that the two take, even leading up to David's death, is so remarkably different," he said.

Powers engages Pelaez Chavez in an attempt to calm him down, gives him space, "because there's nobody else around to get hurt," said Schwaiger.

"Powers is handling the situation by just creating more space, talking his time and trying to talk. He's asking him about his family, 'So do you want to call them?' and all this stuff. Then, as the situation progresses, Dietrick appears on the scene, he's yelling, 'Drop it drop it drop it' to a guy who doesn't speak English, is barefoot, standing on stones, yelling at the helicopter which is circling the air."

As can be seen on the body-worn footage, Pelaez Chavez then crouches over and is shot three times by Dietrick-- in the arm, chest and head.

"Frankly, the difference in approach between the two deputies is all you need to know," said Schwaiger. "It didn't have to go that way. One deputy didn't consider using deadly force. .. the other one pressed the situation unnecessarily and ended up killing a man."

Pelaez Chavez's mental state may also come into play, Schwaiger said.

Though the suspect's family says he has no history of mental illness, "he's obviously in some type of crisis," said Schwaiger. "That's undeniable."

Schwaiger said that federal law dictates that if a person is experiencing a mental health emergency or an emotional crisis, "that's a factor that weighs against the use of deadly force."

Schwaiger anticipates suing for wrongful death, excessive force, loss of familial association on behalf of Pelaez Chavez's children, and loss of consortium on behalf of his wife.

The Sonoma Sheriff's Office has released body-worn camera footage of the pursuit and shooting of Pelaez Chavez.

The first footage was released on Aug. 14 and can be seen at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFKzfpC10ys.

More footage was released Thursday and can be viewed at https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ffbj2we5pqi07l5/AADVd_PCDpKEqOzv_kYXVNzqa?dl=0.

Some video must be downloaded to view it in its entirety.