Hate speech is abhorrent, widespread on the Internet and elsewhere, and Constitutionally protected by the First Amendment. {mp3remote}http://media.krcb.org/audio/nbr/6-23-09.mp3{/mp3remote}

 

The near-absolute protection of all forms of speech by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (see full text, at left)  is a rarity, not even shared by Great Britain, whose Magna Carta served as a model and inspiration for our Founding Fathers. Peter Scheer, Executive Director of the First Amendment Coalition in San Rafael, notes that other long-established western Democracies in Europe set tighter limits.

{mp3remote}http://media.krcb.org/audio/nbr/europe.mp3{/mp3remote}

The risk inherent in attempting to legislate against hate speech, says Peter Scheer (right), lies in how it is defined, and who is doing the defining.

{mp3remote}http://media.krcb.org/audio/nbr/slope.mp3{/mp3remote}

Even in thoroughly modern and democratic nations, attempts to limit hate speech have proven problematic. Scheer details a specific recent instance in Canada.

{mp3remote}http://media.krcb.org/audio/nbr/canadalaw.mp3{/mp3remote}

 

 

 

 

Northern California
Public Media Newsletter

Get the latest updates on programs and events.