krcb header-tagline

support krcb button 2

Text Size

The Slants Win Supreme Court Battle Over Band's Name In Trademark Dispute

Members of the rock band The Slants have the right to call themselves by a disparaging name, the Supreme Court says, in a ruling that could have broad impact on how the First Amendment is applied in other trademark cases.

The Slants' leader Simon Tam filed a lawsuit after the Patent and Trademark Office kept the band from registering its name and rejected its appeal, citing the Lanham Act, which prohibits any trademark that could "disparage ... or bring ... into contemp[t] or disrepute" any "persons, living or dead," as the court states.

After a federal court agreed with Tam and his bands, the Patent and Trade Office sued the band to avoid being compelled to register its name as a trademark. On Monday, the Supreme Court sided with The Slants.

"The disparagement clause violates the First Amendment's Free Speech Clause," Justice Samuel Alito wrote in his opinion for the court. Contrary to the Government's contention, trademarks are private, not government speech."

The band has said it wanted to reclaim what is often seen as a slur.

"We grew up and the notion of having slanted eyes was always considered a negative thing," Tam said in January. "Kids would pull their eyes back in a slant-eyed gesture to make fun of us ... I wanted to change it to something that was powerful, something that was considered beautiful or a point of pride instead."

The case could inform arguments over other, much larger entities than The Slants.

As NPR's Nina Totenberg has reported, "the trademark office has denied registration to a group calling itself "Abort the Republicans," and another called "Democrats Shouldn't Breed." It canceled the registration for the Washington Redskins in 2014 at the behest of some Native Americans who considered the name offensive."

In his opinion about another facet of the case, Alito wrote:

"There is also a deeper problem with the argument that commercial speech may be cleansed of any expression likely to cause offense. The commercial market is well stocked with merchandise that disparages prominent figures and groups, and the line between commercial and non-commercial speech is not always clear, as this case illustrates. If affixing the commercial label permits the suppression of any speech that may lead to political or social 'volatility,' free speech would be endangered."

The judgment was unanimous — with two asterisks: Justice Neil Gorsuch, who wasn't yet on the court when the case was argued in January, did not take part. And with different parts of the case drawing differing legal explanations, four opinions were written.

Copyright 2017 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.

Original Source

Music News

Jan 21

The Dream Syndicate, Tori Amos, Mary Gauthier and more - this week on World Cafe

Here is the music to listen for this week on World Cafe: Monday, January 22nd – The Dream Syndicate Last year the Dream Syndicate released their first album since they split almost 30 years ago.
Default Image
Jan 21

The Dream Syndicate On World Cafe

Welcome to a rock 'n' roll reunion, with our guests The Dream Syndicate. In 2017, the band released its first new album since breaking up nearly 30 years ago. At the end of last year, I spoke to…
Default Image
Jan 21

Halsey's Recital Of 'A Story Like Mine' Traces The Staggering Prevalence Of Assault

Content advisory: The video below contains strong language and may be offensive to some.Thousands of people took to the streets this past Saturday in the second Women's March on Washington, a…
Default Image
Jan 21

Charli XCX's 'Pop 2' Emphasizes Collaboration And Emotion

Copyright 2018 Fresh Air. To see more, visit Fresh Air.
Default Image
Jan 21

Austin Establishes 'Hi, How Are You?' Day To Encourage Mental Health Support

Daniel Johnston, the outsider folk artist who became foundational (and totemic) in the music scene of his adopted home of Austin, Texas in the '80s and early '90s, turns 57 years old today.